Civ 5 vs civ 6
Incivility consists of personal attacks, rudeness and disrespectful comments. "Civility is to human nature what warmth is to wax." Remember to explain your edit, especially when things are getting heated to avoid personal comments about any editors you have disputes with and to use the talk page to further explain your view of the situation. They cannot be changed after pressing "Save", and are often written in haste, particularly in stressful situations. They are relatively short comments and thus potentially subject to misinterpretation or oversimplification. Even if you see the comment as ridiculous, they very probably don't, and expressing ridicule is likely only to offend and antagonise, rather than helping.
Avoid editing while you're in a bad mood.Nobody likes to be bossed about by an editor who appears to believe that they are "superior" nobody likes a bully. Passion can be misread as aggression, so take great care to avoid the appearance of being heavy-handed or bossy. Consider using a personal message instead of, or in addition to, the templated message. Be careful about issuing templated messages to editors you're currently involved in a dispute with, and exercise caution when using templated messages for newcomers (see Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers). Be careful with user warning templates.Use good edit summaries, and use the talk page if the edit summary does not provide enough space or if a more substantive debate is likely to be needed. Insufficient explanations for edits can be perceived as uncivil. Incivility – or the appearance of incivility – typically arises from heated content disputes.
Be especially welcoming and patient towards new users who contribute constructively, but politely discourage non-constructive newcomers. Try to treat your fellow editors as respected colleagues with whom you are working on an important project. Discussion of other editors should be limited to polite discourse about their actions.Įditors are expected to be reasonably cooperative, to refrain from making personal attacks, to work within the scope of policies, and to be responsive to good-faith questions. Resolve differences of opinion through civil discussion disagree without being disagreeable. Such exchanges waste our efforts and undermine a positive, productive working environment. An uncivil remark can escalate spirited discussion into a personal argument that no longer focuses objectively on the problem at hand. Faceless written words on talk pages and in edit summaries do not fully transmit the nuances of verbal conversation, sometimes leading to misinterpretation of an editor's comments. Other editors may seem oversensitive when their views are challenged.
When discussing these differences some editors can seem unnecessarily harsh, while simply trying to be forthright. Civil, respectful interactions are important.ĭifferences of opinion are inevitable in a collaborative project.